In Part 9

Nuisance Lawsuits

Deferring to Advisors

Social Media Posts Embedment in Articles

Misinformation Labeling

Vaccine Hesitancy

Short Illnesses and Coincidences

Religion-Building

Speculation is Inappropriate

Gaslighting

Psst! Let me tell you a secret!

Controlled Opposition

Nuisance Lawsuits

Powerful people and groups have long used the courts to punish anyone who stands in the way of their domination. Monsanto and the Church of Scientology are reputed for suing people who stand in their way. 

It makes no difference if there is any credibility to the lawsuit and the odds of the complainant winning are poor. The main purpose of nuisance lawsuits is to punish the defendant financially. No matter how outrageous the claims, the defendant may need to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars of his own money for his legal defense even if he wins. Nuisance lawsuits are a legal form of depriving another of his own money. 

Another purpose of nuisance lawsuits is publicity. Many people mistakenly assume that someone who is being sued is probably guilty. Thus, nuisance lawsuits play a role in public opinion.

Some human rights activists and experts have been subject to this legal form of abuse. The conspirators know that lawsuits will punish activists by depriving them of a large amount of money and causing them a great deal of stress. Robert Malone has stated on the Joe Rogan podcast that Dr. Peter McCollough is $150,000 in debt from the nuisance lawsuit against him for criticizing COVID vaccines. Undoubtedly, this legal tactic is also a form of propaganda. They realize that the public tends to side with the complainant, unaware that lawsuits are often deployed solely for the aforementioned reasons.

Deferring to Advisors

It is astonishing that the politicians who have attacked their own people with ‘public health measures’ refuse to take any responsibility for those actions. When faced with questions about the negative effects or poor results of their pandemic policies, politicians routinely point the finger at others. “I was just doing what my advisors [or public health officer] recommended!” they shout, claiming no responsibility for their own actions. Their advisors’ recommendations are usually confidential, so the public is unable to verify the my advisors made me do it claim. Of course, politicians can make decisions on their own and order their advisor employees to take the blame and claim they they (the advisors) insisted on that course of action.

Rogue rulers have always played the just following my advisors recommendations card. Robert Mugabe, for instance, claims no responsibility for causing hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. He was only doing what his economic advisors recommended and thus is not responsible for the inflation, he claims. 

Claiming no responsibility while pointing your finger at people who have no contact with the media is a pitiful scheme. Firstly, advisors only give advice. Politicians don’t have to follow that advice. The politician is accountable to the public, not the advisors. Secondly, many advisors are in the pocket of the pharmaceutical industry. They are compromised and should not even be in that role. It is well-known that the Prime Minister of Israel sought his pandemic response strategy (at least in regard to vaccination) directly from Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer.

Thirdly, following advice of scientific advisors should still come with justifications. Presumably, the politician has been adequately briefed on the situation and should be able to explain her choices. However, this card is usually played in the absence of even the shortest explanation. Finally, it is naive to assume that all of a governor’s advisors give her exactly the same advice. In the absence of consensus, the excuse falls apart. In the presence of consensus, however, there is probably coercion or corruption at play! There is never an excuse for a politician to dodge accountability by pointing her finger at anyone else.

Social Media Posts Embedment in Articles

In order to make their totalitarian call-to-action seem more credible, the media always have “experts” (credentialed propagandists) to vet them. Increasingly, mainstream news outlets have been including Tweets from credentialed propagandists in their articles. Sometimes, these articles give as much space to the Tweets as the article body itself! For instance, there was recently a very short article by CTV News in Canada demanding that a premier immediately instigate a hard lockdown of the province, followed by half a dozen screenshots of Tweets from experts demanding the same. The article provided no information. It was essentially an open letter of political demands.

Embedding social media posts of paid propagandists is a whole new low for the Canadian media. Prior to the plandemic, one would never see a Tweet in a news article. By compiling Tweets of credentialed propagandists in a newspaper article, the corrupt media is able to cram in more expert porn than in a traditional article in which the news agency has to actually interview each expert. They know that their political demands cannot be rationally justified so they compensate by piling on social media posts by other propagandists.

Any truthful information related to the pandemic is labeled as ‘misinformation’ (sometimes ‘disinformation’) by the conspirators… everything but their own lies. This labeling tactic has become ubiquitous since the pandemic started. It is an affront to people’s intelligence that they could be so easily deceived that by merely uttering the word misinformation, they will disregard any and all evidence against the pandemic response. And yet it worked perfectly! People really are that stupid!

By labeling all information which contradicts the mainstream narrative as misinformation, the conspirators have conditioned the public to only listen to them. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has actually stated that her administration is New Zealanders’ “single source of truth” and to disregard any other source of pandemic information. The public is so brainwashed that they believe anything the government and media says. Since the conspirators label any counter-information as misinformation, Covidists readily accept it to be misinformation regardless of its grounding in evidence and reason. 

Misinformation labeling is one of those propaganda tactics that one wouldn’t think would work for an extended period. Yet to this day, Covidists point to any evidence against the pandemic response as misinformation, no matter how credible the evidence or the person presenting the evidence. The fact that Covidists unconditionally accept the pathetic misinformation card is a testament to the thoroughness of their brainwashing.

The WHO and other conspirators have had traction with a related term, infodemic, to explain that ending the pandemic is largely based upon combating misinformation. Again, this ‘misinformation’ of which the WHO speaks is actually the honest information one finds on this site, Robin Monotti’s Telegram channel, and other honest sources. As with the misinformation label, Covidists readily accept that there is an infodemic in which the WHO provides honest information and the freedom movement provides only false information.

In February 2022, a Canadian Member of Parliament asked another MP to name the federal cabinet members who are loyal to the WEF’s agenda (video below). His question was in response to an infamous video of Klaus Schwab, the WEF founder, bragging that the majority of Trudeau’s cabinet are WEF loyalists. The Speaker of the House cut off his question for no reason and another MP immediately shouted out that his question was “promoting open disinformation.” His question was not answered. The misinformation-disinformation propaganda tactic has been so successful that the conspirators get away with calling a question disinformation! And a question by an MP on the House of Commons floor, no less!

Vaccine Hesitancy

The phrase “vaccine hesitancy” gets tossed around constantly by pandemic propagandists. This is a term that can be applied to an individual or a population. In this context, it refers to disinterest in receiving the deadly COVID pseudo-vaccine. The very existence of the term implies that only someone who is mentally incompetent would turn down holiness-in-a-syringe, the most important sacrament the Covidism sect. 

The term implies that it is so obvious that Covid jabs are safe and effective that only someone who is mentally ill would not jump to get one. While “vaccine hesitancy” is not a formal psychiatric diagnosis, it is used as such. Clearly, the term is used to imply a diagnosable mental illness. It also evades discussion of the efficacy and safety of the injection. It is a tactic emanating from the “It’s already been decided” ploy, similar to the “climate denier” label pinned to anyone who refuses to blindly accept the UN’s dogma on climate change. Rather than the media discussing the mountains of evidence that COVID shots are dangerous, they change the debate to the mental incompetence of skeptics.

Short Illnesses and Coincidences

Covidists usually refer to people dying from their death shots as coincidences having nothing to do with the injections (invariably slandering anyone who suggests otherwise). Of course, the perpetrators of the crime of extermination will do everything they can to hide their commissions. But they overplay their case. They often claim that no one has ever died from COVID shots. Also, the “coincidence” card is always accompanied by a hate tirade against human rights activists. Do those two points not display overt guilt on their part?

Another way the media hides COVID pseudo-vaccine deaths is by referring to it as a death following a “short illness.” Deaths of high profile individuals who have died from the shots are often reported in the news with conspicuous vagueness as a death resulting from a “short illness.” No explanation is offered as to what illness that is or what precipitated it. The presstitutes avoid exposing their vaccine genocide while acting coy, making it seem like it is immoral and inappropriate to ask why the famous person has died.

The conspirators know that their prescribed pandemic response could never be accepted by the public on logical grounds. So how does one get millions of people to believe in a set of proposals which have no logical basis? Why, by structuring their conspiracy as a religion, mi amigos! From the outset, the pandemic response has been structured as a religion. The results have been spectacularly successful. Those who believe in the pandemic response are totally unaffected by logic and reason, believing poor compliance makes them an infidel.

The foundation of religion-building is glorification and divinitization of the sect leaders (see Part 8). This is the basis of any new religion. No matter how absurd the advice of the leaders of the pandemic response, Covidists justify their compliance by saying that they have faith in their pandemic leaders. 

Identification is another essential component of building a religion or cult. Followers base their identity to a very high degree in being Christian, Muslim, etc. Identification with the Covidism sect has been encouraged by its leaders. People are taught to brag about being fully vaccinated and isolating at home while not even sick. Mask-wearing exists largely for this purpose, as well. Wearing a mask signals to others that you follow Fauci’s religion and lets followers identify others outside their group, so they know whom to shame and shun. 

People are pressured into joining a religion by shaming and ostracizing those outside of it. Today, everyone is petrified of being labeled a COVIDIOT or anti-vaxxer and the resultant social rejection that comes along with it. In Canada, all non-Covidists are actually labeled sexist and racist. This has compelled nearly all Canadians to join the sect to avoid stigmatization. 

As a (very sensitive) religion, any criticism of the pandemic response is decried as spiritual heresy. The media doesn’t openly discuss the pandemic response. Besides calling any accurate information “misinformation,” presstitutes play the heresy card to keep the public in the dark. Newspaper readers learn that people are talking blasphemy against their sacramental COVID vaccines and respond with hate against the heretics and dismissal of their arguments on religious grounds. Have you noticed that Covidists never debate their views with skeptics? Whenever they hear something that they don’t like, they dismiss it as sacrilege and revel in adherence to their faith! 

Since the pandemic response has been successfully construed as a religious sect, educating its followers on the truth is extremely difficult. With their identities tied into being vaxxers and their religious infatuation with the people who have tricked, imprisoned, and poisoned them, it could be many years before the majority begin to awaken. See Brainwashing in Covidism for further information.

Speculation is Inappropriate

There are contexts in which speculation can be inappropriate. In a criminal trial, for example. Imprisoning someone is a very serious matter. It wouldn’t be justifiable to convict someone of a crime based only on speculation. To prevent a wrongful conviction, only hard evidence should base the decision.

Ironic how the governments of the world imprisoned billions of people purely based upon speculation only to declare criticism of it heresy on the basis that the criticism is itself ‘speculation.’ Propagandists have drilled into us that we should not speculate on anything related to the pandemic and that to do so is dangerous. 

What do they label speculation? Everything they don’t want to hear! Offering a counter-narrative opinion, expressing skepticism of the pandemic response, interpretation of evidence — if they don’t like it, it’s speculation and misinformation. I have even seen a post on an online forum mentioning this website deleted by the moderator on the grounds that the Why Lockdowns Do Not Reduce Contagion page ‘speculated’ about COVID in India. All the page had on India was a graph with no commentary!

Anti-speculation propaganda has proven to be a very powerful form of mind control. The conspirators consistently attack anyone forming conclusions of evidence which discredit them. As a result, people have become afraid to interpret evidence or in any way express criticism. But it is deeper than that. The that’s all speculation ploy has had such a deep effect on people psychologically, they have learned to not even think anything critical of the pandemic response. Thinking = internal speculation = human resources office visit-level inappropriateness. No matter how clear the evidence against the pandemic response, Covidists will respond “I don’t speculate.” The mental conditioning of this tactic is profound.

Gaslighting

To gaslight someone is to convince him that he is crazy. The conspirators have put enormous effort into gaslighting specific individuals, as well as everyone who disagrees with them. Gaslighting is used in many ways. There have been cases of activists, lawyers, and doctors speaking against lockdowns who have been thrown into mental institutions and accused of being mentally ill. All a corrupt government needs is one corrupt psychiatrist to sign off that a person is mentally incompetent and all of that person’s legal rights are voided. In Australia, a man was committed to a mental institution and told he was mentally ill after he told his wife he didn’t believe in lockdowns and she reported him to the police! His mental illness diagnosis? Not believing in “authority”!

In taking the outrageous step in accusing dissidents of mental illness, the already-brainwashed masses readily accept that the accused are actually mentally ill. The accused may even question their own sanity. Seeing leaders of the freedom movement getting diagnosed as insane is enough to convince many people that the movement as a whole is not credible. Ironically, any psychiatrist making this diagnosis in good faith to anyone who criticizes the pandemic response is himself clinically insane.

The most impactful form of gaslighting has been against the general public. The government and media claim that the public health pandemic measures are warranted and effective such that only a deeply mentally ill person would dream of criticizing them. In reality, the measures are so ineffective and evil that only psychologically compromised people would tolerate them. Yet the public has accepted this narrative along with all of the other propaganda. Being convinced that only the insane criticize the pandemic response, the majority of the public won’t even listen to counter-narrative views or evidence.

People injured by the COVID pseudo-vaccines are consistently gaslighted. To hide the fact that adverse events are very common, people who complain of them to their doctor are often told by their doctor and/or a government agency that they are mistaken and their symptoms either stem from another cause or are the result of their imagination! Because of their faith in authority, victims of the clot shots too often accept this explanation.

Psst! Let me tell you a secret!

A clever and effective way to spread lies is to act as if you are sharing a secret. Covidists love this method. There have been incidences of propagandists Tweeting that such-and-such a politician KNEW (yes, they actually capitalize “knew”) he was slaughtering people by not locking down the province. It goes something like this, “Premier Kenney KNEW he was killing hordes of elderly by not ordering a strict lockdown of the province. He KNEW the ENTIRE TIME how his policies were killing Albertans, yet did nothing because of his right-wing ideology.” (I read a Tweet about Premier Kenney almost identical to this.)

By relating a position as if you are revealing a secret, people have their guards down and are more ready to accept your position. Apparently, humans subconsciously have difficulty comprehending that someone ‘whispering a secret in your ear’ could be intentionally lying. Revealing a secret also makes the propagandist seem really smart by insinuating that she somehow has inside knowledge (in the above example, that would be that there is clear evidence that lockdowns save lives and that Jason Kenney was privy to that evidence at the beginning of the pandemic).

The power of the COVID conspirators to infiltrate and convert influential people is not confined to members of the media and medical regulators. The medi-totalitarian cult that has engulfed the entire world truly has unlimited power to pull people into its fold. Recognizable figures of the ‘freedom movement’’ are not exempt from the cult’s influence.

It is remarkable how unified the global freedom movement is against COVID vaccines. Despite the ubiquitous propaganda, hundreds of millions of people have taken the time to research the matter and discovered for themselves that COVID vaccines have sky high risks for severe side effects, long-term injury, and death for everyone. Because of the valiant efforts of scientists to educate people about the harms of these injections, it is no exaggeration to say that the entire freedom (ie. anti-lockdown) movement has stood against any coercion to take them.

Despite being so united, the freedom movement suffers internal corruption. A few of the most prominent anti-lockdown figures now propagandize for the injectable bioweapon like it is there job. (Perhaps it is.) This should not come as a surprise as most of them promote COVID vaccination in the elderly only. This is an extremely important point. Is it not telling that people who are not elderly promote vaccination only for the elderly, yet strongly oppose coercion to get vaccinated for people their age?

It is easy to see that these people are simply acting in their own personal interests. It doesn’t take a saint to fight the very lockdown that he is being forced to endure! Considering the cyclical nature of lockdowns, fighting the lockdown cult in other states or countries when your home is more open is still a selfish act. Until the lockdown nonsense is squashed around the world, no place is ever safe — you could be next to be forced to stay home against your will.

The same can be said for coercion or mandates to wear a face mask or get vaccinated. If they don’t presently apply to where you live, they could at any time. People recognize this. That is why they are so adamant that COVID vaccination should be completely voluntary everywhere in the world. No one who opposes lockdowns, masks, or mandated COVID vaccination anywhere can be considered to be altruistic in any way. They know that these are harmful practices and are desperately trying to save themselves and their families. However, vaccination of the elderly is a different story. People can promote COVID pseudo-vaccination of seniors while feeling safe from the fruits of their advocacy because they are not themselves elderly.

It should therefore not come as a surprise to see people opposing lockdowns and mandatory vaccination while recommending people voluntarily get vaccinated. That way they can protect themselves from their government while avoiding the ‘anti-vaxxer’ stigma. An “anti-vaxxer” label can be life-ruining.

Being honest about this bioweapon and the harm that it does can end you’re career, social life, and have the majority of the public despising you like your a cartoon villain. No one wants that. In fact, it is almost universal that people are afraid of being the next “example” for speaking out against COVID shots. In Canada at least, Covidists are merciless in bullying anyone critical of the injectable bioweapon. An anti-vaxxer label is enough to drive someone to suicide.

The preoccupation with avoiding the terrible ‘anti-vaxxer’ fate is also present among activists. I have been told personally by pro-freedom groups that they won’t criticize the vaccines, or even that they promote them, because they are afraid that they will be labelled anti-vaxxers and subsequently have their lives ruined. They understand the dangers of the shots but intentionally mislead the public about their safety so that they won’t be the Covidists’ next mark.

There are reasons other than the anti-vax label why people who oppose mandatory masking, social distancing, and vaccination can be seen promoting the pseudo-vaccines as safe and effective. Financial incentives can never be counted out. As with the most stringent colluders in the Covid conspiracy, bribes of various kinds are employed to gain their compliance. They could be directly given money to promote the vaccine. They could be rewarded a research contract or position. Everyone has their price.

Martin Kulldorff and Jay Bhattacharya are unquestionably compromised, as are the pharma cheerleaders masquerading as freedom groups that cite them as scientific advisors, such as the Brownstone Institute. These Great Barrington Declaration authors have opposed lockdowns for over a year and become leading voices in the freedom movement. However, in 2021, these turncoats seemed to get new jobs as pharma spokespeople, extolling the virtues of the bioweapon and shelving all of the evidence that they have high rates of adverse reactions and low efficacy. Today, these two shills use the same propaganda tactics as the first generation conspirators to cajole our families into accepting the poison.

Double agents are one of the most potent risks to failure of the freedom movement. Because the agents have the trust of the awakened minority, they are perceived to have much higher credibility than regular agents. More importantly, non-Covidists have their guard down when reading their work and are susceptible to accept and spread their word automatically, with no scrutiny or skepticism. People read their articles and say to themselves, “That is sure different from what I have read elsewhere. But Bhattacharya is one of the leaders in the freedom movement, so if he says that the vaccines are safe, then they must be safe. Our guy wouldn’t lie!”

By writing articles and giving interviews that are alternatively anti-Covidist and pro-Covidist, they are easily able to hide the fact that they are as corrupt as any of Fauci’s boys. Given these factors, double agents have remarkable potential to corrupt the entire freedom movement, if they haven’t already.

You cannot trust anyone in this war. The activist you respect the most could become the strongest supporter of The Terror if he wakes up one day and realizes that early retirement in the Cayman Islands is for him. The truther outlet that you have come to rely on for unbiased pandemic information could suddenly do a 180 and promote the COVID vaccines as the greatest gift science has ever produced, as has happened in early 2022 with the Brownstone Institute. 

This is Fauci’s world. You and I are just living in it. Nothing is as it seems anymore… if it ever was. Watch out for propaganda tactics, consistency, and conflicts of interest in anyone you think may be worthy of your trust. Never take anyone’s word at face value — double check the claims for yourself. Don’t limit yourself to only one source of information. Continually cross compare sources with each other to assess their validity. There are no trustworthy sources. Put every single thing you read through the tests of logic and cross validation.