Once freedom is restored in each lockdown-ravaged nation and the perpetrators of the lockdown-vaccination scheme are taken into custody, the work of keeping the world safe from future commissions of medical fascism will begin. Like war and genocide, lockdowns are a scourge on humanity that can never be tolerated. They have earned the moniker, The Terror. Every conceivable precaution must be taken to ensure that our children are safe from this most unholy invention. Medical fascism has as much potential to hurt people as any catastrophe that could befall the human race.
We the people must put in as much effort to prevent future lockdowns as the lockdown conspirators expended carrying out their depraved scheme. A haphazard effort will not be enough to stop the ultra-motivated and ultra-powerful global ruling class from dragging the world back into darkness. A comprehensive approach to lockdown prevention is essential.
The lockdown prevention strategy presented here has five categories of action.
Public Education
People only support lockdowns because they don’t understand them. They don’t understand the immense harm that they cause or the abundance of evidence that they provide no benefits. The public campaign to follow COVID restrictions needs to be replaced with an equally extensive campaign to avoid following those same restrictions. Every adult resident needs to be reached repeatedly about the harms and ineffectiveness of social distancing.
Lockdown Resistance exists for the purpose of educating the public about the harms of lockdowns. However, there remains a dearth of information on the subject online. Everyone should be contacted about the dangers of lockdowns and have access to online sources for further information in their language, including content specific to their location. High production value videos are an important part of public education. Videos can educate people who lack the motivation to read, as well as capture people’s emotions. Many people are only persuaded by their feelings, so impactful videos are essential to de-indoctrinating the public.
Education should not be limited to lockdowns, but extend to other areas that are necessary to build resilience to future coercion. Rights education is one of these. Every citizen needs to understand their constitutional rights, including their rationale and philosophical foundation. They need to internalize that rights are to be demanded from the government and the government has no authority of any kind to violate fundamental rights.
Public knowledge of propaganda techniques and cognitives biases is absolutely critical to preventing the establishment from completing another mass psyop. High schools should include these in the curriculum so people will come of age knowing how to protect themselves from mind control. There needs to be an open and continuous public discussion about media literacy and cognitive bias, the same way there is about less controversial issues such as the economy.
Political Strategies
Limit Government Power
There needs to be a severe restriction of authority for the legislative and executive branches of government. Government acts and is regarded as ‘the boss’ of the residents of a country. That is not an ethical role for government to play and inevitably results in misuse. Government is a multi-service provider. It’s only legitimate role is in the provision of services. It has no business telling anyone what to do and acting like it has some kind of ‘authority’ over anyone. It just provides services.
Governments must be restructured to eliminate any chance of government, including the premier or the legislature, restricting freedoms. “Emergency” powers must be as impossible to obtain for the president of a country as for the lowest peasant. The role of ‘public health officer’ must be abolished. It has only ever existed to enable dictatorship, allowing premiers to get away with callous rule under the guise of ‘public health.’ Everyone has wifi at home to access health information. No one needs to be ordered to live healthier by a Mommy figure.
Because of the fallibility of human nature, no person or group should be given power over others. Governments of all levels mustn’t have the ability to restrict freedom for individuals or organizations (except for reasonable regulations). It is unethical to give anyone the power to close businesses or limit interactions among people.
Police departments must be free of all political control, similar to the judiciary.
This is not to say that governments should be made smaller. Government can legitimately be any size and provide any amount of services as long as it limits its role to service provision and doesn’t make any claims of authority. There has never existed anything such as government authority. The only authority of government is the license to carry out various services, such as building roads or providing healthcare. It is only due to human weakness that people look to their governments as a parental figure to tell them how to live and what to think.
Police Independence
Despotism involves taking control of the police or military and using them against the people. We have seen this happen to billions of people in 2020 in the lockdown-vaccination plot. The police have not had the integrity to refuse to carry out the orders of the new tyrants. We must make it impossible for this to continue. The police need a far greater degree of independence from government.
Government can continue to make the laws, but the police should have complete discretion over which laws they choose to enforce. You cannot have politicians giving orders to the police. Time and again, that has resulted in politicians using the police to usher in an authoritarian regime.
The government must not have any way of controlling the police, such as by firing deviant police commissioners. Police departments must be free of all political control, similar to the judiciary. With an independent police force, they can no longer be forced to carry out any laws with which they disagree. Individual police officers should also be afforded more discretion in carrying out their duties. For instance, if an officer thinks that someone justifiably broke a law, he should have the authority to refrain from laying charges.
Legal Strategies
Criminalize Human Rights Violations
Presently, government leaders can get away with basically anything. They don’t have to follow their own constitution. They are not criminally liable for committing on a mass scale what is a crime on an individual scale. It is a crime, for instance, to hold someone hostage in his own home. However, when your premier holds the entire province hostage, the police never come to arrest her for the crime of hostage-taking. That needs to change.
Restrictions of basic rights must be universally criminalized. Politicians, public health officials, and police officers must be criminally prosecuted for taking away what God has freely granted. Impunity is at the root of human rights abuses. With no risk of prosecution, members of the government have little incentive to respect human rights.
Majority public support cannot be used as an excuse for a premier to violate rights en masse any more than it can be used as an excuse for a private citizen to commit a serious crime. Heinous acts of cruelty, such as forcing people to be alone or cover their faces all day long, must be universally forbidden. If the majority of society wanted a certain individual dead, it doesn’t make it morally or legally acceptable to commit homicide against that tragically unpopular individual.
The same ethos needs to be applied on a broader scale. Severe restrictions on liberty should not be inflicted upon anyone irrespective of popular support. A person should only have her freedom denied if she has been convicted of a crime, lacks the mentally competency to live independently, or is experiencing a suicidal episode.
The old adage that ‘the punishment should fit the crime’ is rational and should be applied to the those responsible for The Terror. Homicide of one person often results in a prison sentence of 25 years or more. Lockdowns have effectively ended the lives of the entire population, therefore, life in prison with no chance of parole is warranted. It is also befitting for lockdown criminals to taste their own medicine. Strict solitary confinement with a total absence of human contact is the only suitable sentence. Anything else would be an injustice to the millions of victims.
Civil Sanctions
A root cause of lockdowns is the unethical behavior of the news media. The press has consistently lied to the public about the severity of COVID and the benefit of lockdowns. They continue to provoke the public unceasingly, keeping hysteria as high as possible so people keep tuning in to them out of fear. The media shares equal responsibility with the government for lockdowns. They have brainwashed the public into thinking that their own freedom and wellbeing are unimportant. They have put intense, direct pressure on the government to restrict freedoms as much as possible. Regardless of the severity of the human rights violations, the news media pressures the government to make them far more severe.
Considering that The Terror is driven by news media propaganda, it is equally important to punish conspirators in the industry. News executives should face criminal prosecution for inciting the ‘public health’ horrors. For other members of the press, civil sanctions would be appropriate. Prosecuting every reporter who conspired to imprison his entire country could overload the courts.
It is vital that the International Criminal Court in the Hague, which has over 120 member nations, formally include lockdowns as a crime against humanity.
Bringing everyone who contributed to lockdowns to justice is essential to prevent The Terror from happening again. Criminal prosecution is not the only tool that the government has to administer justice or defend public interests. Civil sanctions involve putting limitations on individuals or organizations in lieu of criminal sentences. Given sufficient authority, they can be imposed by a government body without involvement of courts. Every reporter, media personality, and news executive who has advocated for rights restrictions or presented only the anti-rights side of the coronavirus response issue should be permanently banned from working in the media or politics. Such sanctions are necessary to protect society from their wicked influence, as well as to deter others from engaging in similar behavior.
Civil sanctions should also be employed at the organizational level. The news agencies that have promoted lockdowns should be dissolved by the government. In some countries, such as Canada and Britain, that means all but destroying the industry. With the Guardian (UK), CBC (Canada), CNN (USA), and other agencies that waged war on humanity gone, new organizations will be created to replace them.
Rising from their ashes, the new generation of news media will be wiser and place a high regard on honest, ethical conduct. The economy will not be affected by the razing of the news industry because it is a small industry and it won’t take long before new socially responsible firms take their place. This measure will protect the economy — it is the news industry’s promotion of lockdowns that caused the economy to shut down.
Google, including its Youtube division, must be dismantled. Google-Youtube has gone to great lengths to remove honest scientific information and advocacy of rights during the pandemic. Facebook is equally guilty in this regard. Any opinion or artifact of evidence which calls into question COVID restrictions or vaccines is swiftly removed. Usually Facebook will permanently close the accounts. No one will miss Google, Youtube, or Facebook. There are already other search engines, video databases, and social media platforms that are ethical and do not censor honest information. Bitchute is an honest version of Youtube. Parler, Gab, and Telegram are ethical social media platforms. However, Google, Youtube, and Facebook have a near-monopoly in their respective spaces which is unlikely to unwind without bold government intervention.
Not only that, but Big Tech colludes to sabotage honest platforms. For instance, they successfully had Parler shut down. That is why it is necessary to permanently shut down Google-Youtube, Facebook, and other online criminal organizations that have been suppressing democracy. As long as these institutions exist, they will fight to take away all of your basic rights. They are evil. They are only a yoke on a free society. They must be permanently sanctioned to cease operations. The executives of these gangs must also receive lifelong sanctions to stay out of any kind of service that has the potential to filter information for the public.
Politicians and executive public servants that played any part in The Terror also need to be subject to sanctions. They must be prohibited from participation in politics or senior civil service for life. They have already caused destruction on an unprecedented scale, they cannot be allowed to have power again. It is not safe to allow these villains to have a platform that they can again use against society.
Amend International Criminal Law
It is vital that the International Criminal Court in the Hague, which has over 120 member nations, formally include lockdowns as a crime against humanity. Article 7 of ICC’s Rome Statute lists eleven acts as crimes against humanity. Lockdowns violate a number of the existing enumerated acts. However, due to the low awareness of that fact, it would be immensely helpful to include “the crime of lockdown” as the twelfth enumerated act, along with a thorough definition of the term ‘lockdown.’
The definition of lockdown should include any restrictions on mobility or interpersonal interaction. Strict shelter-in-place orders are only one form of lockdown. Rules preventing people from meeting new people or limiting one’s social network are just as harmful as sheltering in place to many people, and should be legally considered a “lockdown.”
International Convention Against Lockdowns
Lockdowns are the biggest human-caused disaster in history. Nothing has ever caused more suffering or destruction of self. The scale of their harm and high probability of recurrence necessitate a global convention prohibiting their use. The United Nations should form an international treaty to prohibit and punish the use of any form of lockdown or social distancing edict. Exceptions can be included in the treaty, such as quarantines for individuals infected with ebola or another highly contagious infection with similar mortality.
A UN-level Convention acceded or ratified by all member states will be a key component in the prevention of future lockdowns. Political parties in power will know that shutting down their country or state would be in violation of the Lockdown Convention and the public would have a greater awareness of the gravity of such measures.
Institutional Strategies
The COVID pandemic has witnessed a systemic failure of every safeguard of society to prevent crimes against humanity. Opposition parties in parliament failed to oppose the restrictions. Civil society organizations failed to stand up for citizens’ interests. Civil liberties NGOs failed to defend civil liberties. Police officers have completely abandoned their oaths to respect the constitution, uphold human rights, and protect the public. The systemic institutional failure to prevent rights violations requires a systematic effort to reform the affected organizations.
In today’s society, public opinion is the main determinant of organizational policy. It is in the best interest of organizations to pander to whatever sentiment is the most popular in order to receive public acceptance in the form of clients and donors. Most “civil liberties” and “human rights” organizations have promoted lockdowns to prevent a loss of donor revenue and avoid the negative publicity that comes along with defying the narrative of the establishment. Since they have completely abandoned their own missions, they have no credibility left and should voluntarily cease operating.
Each organization needs to conduct a sincere internal examination to find out what went wrong and how to prevent another catastrophic failure of its mission. For organizations whose missions are related to poverty or mental health, a complete change of management may be required if they are to regain any public confidence. Public institutions, such as police departments, should publish a report on their findings and their plan to correct their failings.
A promising option for media regulation is to model news output after parliamentary sessions — let the opposition state their own case!
Individuals can participate in institutional reform by only supporting organizations that implement necessary reforms and adhere to strict opposition of “public health” restrictions. For instance, individuals should only vote for political candidates that are strongly anti-lockdown. They should also only donate to nonprofits that express remorse for their failings and resolve to fight human rights abuses in the future. Boycotting news agencies that have promoted restrictions on rights is another step that each person can take.
Creation of new institutions with a targeted mission of the eradication of lockdowns and other forms of medical tyranny will be essential. Considering the universal failure of all institutions that were supposed to protect us from tyranny, dedicated anti-lockdown institutions may be the only ones that will be able to resist the corrupting forces of medical fascism in the future. Nonprofit organizations at the state, national, and international levels will be key allies to monitor for signs of medical tyranny and orchestrate a robust response to The Terror should it arise again.
The success of anti-lockdown NGOs will depend on adequate funding. The rich business people and corporations that made trillions from lockdowns, such as Michael Bloomberg and Jeff Bezos, should be forced to foot the bill. It is not a complex matter to determine the conflicts of interest that have led to billionaires making trillions of dollars due to lockdowns. The $3.9 trillion that billionaires made from the lockdown in 2020 alone is more than enough to fund anti-lockdown institutions in perpetuity.
Media Regulation
New safeguards are required to prevent the media from continuing to subvert people’s rational minds and inciting future catastrophes. Outright government censorship of the media is problematic because it is likely to be misused. For instance, in early 2021, the government of Canada tried to pass legislation to prevent “misinformation” in the media. There was an outcry about this legislation because it is very easy to abuse. The government would be able to easily prevent the media from unfavorable reporting on itself. Since the pandemic started, governments all over the world have tried to prevent the public from learning accurate information about lockdowns by claiming that it is “misinformation.”
Fortunately, it is possible to mitigate media disinformation without highly corruptible censorship laws. In the United States, from 1949 to 1987, the Fairness Doctrine obliged the press to report on issues honestly and objectively. Introducing similar legislation today would be a service to the public. However, regulation of this type has major drawbacks.
Under censorship guidelines, news agencies could still present the view they oppose in a skewed fashion. This is what has happened in the pandemic. News articles contain ‘straw man’ arguments. They don’t refute the actual views of lockdown critics, but what they claim are the critics’ views. There are other ways to keep up the appearance objectiveness while actively discrediting opposing views. For instance, a news program can deliberately select incompetent debaters or humiliate and bully anyone representing the view they want to smear.
A promising option for media regulation is to model news output after parliamentary sessions — let the opposition state their own case! For television news programs, the last few minutes of the show can be reserved for another organization to present an alternative view itself. For online articles, there can be a link to a third party article presenting the opposing view. Print articles could have a certain percentage of the words alloted for a response by a third party. In this way, consumers of the news get to learn all sides of the issue directly from the people representing those sides. Regulation of this sort would make it very difficult for news firms to mislead the public as they have during the coronavirus pandemic.
The Terror of social distancing will continue to plague the world unless a monumental shift in consciousness occurs. An entrenched awareness of the ability and inclination of power holders to carry out novel mass atrocities must be fostered among citizens. Every source of coercive power, including government, police, and the media, needs to be ardently contained in order to keep the public safe from evil men and women.
Change starts with culture. The culture of blind faith in powerful people and institutions must be replaced with confidence in one’s own wisdom and common sense. Parents should instill in their children the values of limitations on power and respect for others’ rights. Non-governmental organizations need to hold governments to account. Most importantly, people need to recognize that the majority can be catastrophically wrong and the heroes of every era are always the ones that are most demonized by the establishment.
Checks on power are not enough. Determined individuals can still find a way to carry out their devious schemes. Only severe retribution and sanctions will deter members of the global elite class from attempting lockdowns or other crimes against humanity in the future. There can be no impunity for inflicting mass psychological torture on society, not even for heads of state. Life-long prison sentences for every senior agent responsible for The Terror and life-long sanctions for lower level enforcers is our only hope to keep our children safe from future calamities.